BEST  OF  SOELR 2000
..
<<< BACK
E R Z O N E
.
..
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

CHECKLISTS
..

CHECKLIST 
FOR 
EARLY COUNSELING / 
TECHNICAL REVIEW
CHECKLIST 
FOR
NOTICE OF 
UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE &
OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE 
CHECKLIST 
FOR 
PROPOSAL AND DECISION 
NOTICES IN 
PERFORMANCE BASED ACTIONS
..
..
.CHECKLIST FOR EARLY COUNSELING
TECHNICAL REVIEW
.

EXAMINE STANDARDS FOR POSSIBLE PROBLEMS

REMINDER! In performance based actions, the focus is on the standard at the level of retention. That is, the performance level that an employee must meet to retain his or her job. Check your agency program to determine whether employees must achieve level 2 (Marginal or Minimally Successful) or level 3 (Fully Successful) in order to stay in the job.  I. DETERMINE IF THE STANDARDS MUST BE REWRITTEN. What can the employee fail to do and still meet the acceptable level of performance for this element?

_ Are the standards written to allow for some level of error? 

YES r NO r r If the answer is no, inform the supervisor that the standards are invalid because they require "absolute" perfection and must be rewritten. Once rewritten, the employee must be given a chance to perform under the new standards to see if he or she can perform acceptably. Advise the supervisor to continue counseling and monitoring the employee’s performance during this time.

r If the answer is yes, move to section II below to determine if the standards need further clarification.
 

If this person did nothing at all, would they meet the acceptable level? Make sure you can discern a "line" between the acceptable and unacceptable levels of performance regarding the number of errors allowed, or the quality of the work to be accomplished, or the volume of work that must be submitted.
  _ Is there a distinction between the requirements for acceptable and unacceptable performance? 
YES r NO r
 
  r If the answer is no, inform the supervisor that the standards are invalid because they describe a "negative" level of performance that allows the employee to work at an unacceptable level and still be rated acceptable. The standards must be rewritten and the employee must be given a chance to perform under the new standards to see if he or she can perform acceptably. Advise the supervisor to continue counseling and monitoring the employee’s performance during this time.

r If the answer is yes, move to section II below to determine if the standards need further clarification.
 

Does the standard read more like a position description or a listing of duties?

_ Does the standard contain qualitative terms that describe a level of performance?

YES r NO r r If the answer is no, the standard may be invalid for one of two reasons. It may simply give the employee no concept of the level of performance that is required, or it may be read as an "absolute" standard under the presumption that the list of duties must be done completely and without error. If the standard contains any kind of qualitative statement, the supervisor may be able to clarify it through additional guidance. If not, the standard must be rewritten and the employee must be given a chance to perform under the new standards to see if he or she can perform acceptably. Advise the supervisor to continue counseling and monitoring the employee’s performance during this time. r If the answer is yes, move to section II below to determine if the standards need further clarification. II. DETERMINE IF THE STANDARDS NEED CLARIFICATION. _ Do the standards use vague, descriptive words like "generally," "usually," "often," "timely?"

YES r NO r

r If the answer is yes, the standard will need to be clarified. Examine each descriptive term in the standard and make sure the supervisor is able to describe what the words means in terms of practical application on the job. Supervisors should explain these performance expectations orally and, whenever possible, in writing.

r If the answer is no, the standard should be clear enough for the employee to understand what level of performance is expected of him or her. Supervisors should counsel the employee on their failure to meet these expectations and consider providing assistance, as necessary.
 
PREPARE THE SUPERVISOR TO COUNSEL THE EMPLOYEE. r Check agency policies and collective bargaining agreements for specific provisions regarding performance counseling. Advise supervisors of these provisions.

r Supervisors should be able to express in which critical element(s) the employee’s performance is falling short or has become unacceptable.

r If the agency program provides for a level 2 (Marginal), make sure the supervisor is able to tell the employee whether his or her work has fallen to the Marginal level or whether it has become unacceptable.

r Employees should be informed of some examples of their poor performance and explanations of what is wrong with their work.

r Supervisors should be able to explain how the work should be done correctly and should make their expectations clear.

r Advise supervisors to encourage employee participation in the discussion as a means of discovering the cause of the employee’s performance difficulties.

r Advise supervisors to summarize their comments in writing and provide the employee with a copy of the summary.

r Agree to meet with the supervisor again in a certain time period. Follow up! 
 

-----------------------------------

CHECKLIST FOR
NOTICE OF UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE &
OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE



 
 

REMINDER! Review all internal agency policies and collective bargaining agreement provisions before providing advice and guidance on the the development of an opportunity notice or "performance improvement plan" (PIP) notice. These provisions may impact on the duration, structure, and nature of assistance provided during the opportunity to improve.


EVIDENCE OF UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE

_ Meet with the supervisor to review documentation of unacceptable performance.

_ Categorize documentation by critical element.

_ Make sure the PIP notice identifies which critical elements the employee is failing.

_ Include examples of performance deficiencies in the PIP notice to demonstrate what constitutes unacceptable performance in the critical element.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  _ See checklist for Early Counseling - use the same process.

_ Make sure the PIP notice informs the employee of the level of performance which must be achieved in order to stay in the job. This will be Level 2 (Marginal) or Level 3 (Fully Successful or Pass) depending upon your agency’s performance program.

_ Include the language of the performance standard in the PIP notice or attach a copy.

_ If the standard is numerical, pro-rate the annual numerical requirement to align with the duration of the opportunity period.

IMPROVEMENT NEEDED _ Clarify the performance expectations in the standard. Be as specific as possible.

_ Say what the employee must do in order to improve.

_ Provide examples, models, checklists, guides, standard operating procedures, etc.

_ Consider the usefulness of using a mentor from within the organization to work with the employee.
 

SUPERVISORY ASSISTANCE _ Make the supervisor’s role clear concerning how the employee should seek help.

_ Establish time and location of any routine performance counseling meetings.

_ Establish a fall-back person for the employee to contact for help if supervisor is not available.

CONSIDER TRAINING NEEDS _ Have the supervisor assess the appropriateness of formal training.

_ Consider any requests from the employee for training.

_ Determine if formal training is available and if money is available to pay for it.

_ Determine what form of on-the-job training would be appropriate.

_ Consider the possibility and availability of computer-assisted training.

*NOTE: Formal training is not a requirement when providing an opportunity to improve.
 

STRUCTURE/CONSEQUENCES

_ The notice must state the duration of the improvement period.

_ The notice must state the possible consequences (demotion, reassignment, removal) if the employee fails to improve to an acceptable level.

_ The notice should explain how the supervisor will monitor performance.
 
 

CHECKLIST FOR 
PROPOSAL AND DECISION NOTICES 
IN PERFORMANCE BASED ACTIONS
 

REMINDER! Review all internal agency policies and collective bargaining agreement provisions before providing advice and guidance on the the development of a performance-based proposal or decision notice. Incorporate agency-specific procedures within the notices.

PROPOSAL NOTICE

_ All performance documentation must be organized by critical element.

_ Supervisor must analyze documentation and determine success or failure at the conclusion of the opportunity to improve.

NOTE: If employee has successfully improved to the acceptable level, provide the employee with a letter that congratulates him or her and informs the employee of the need to maintain performance at an acceptable level. _ Supervisor must decide what action will be proposed. No proposal notice is required if the supervisor elects to reassign the employee.

_ Proposal notice must state that either removal or demotion is being proposed and must state which critical element(s) the employee failed.

_ For each critical element, notice must include examples of unacceptable performance during the opportunity period which form the basis for the proposed action.

NOTE: Agencies may elect to cite unacceptable performance which occurred during the one year preceeding the proposal notice but are only obligated to demonstrate failure during the opportunity period. _ Notice should summarize the performance improvement plan, including any assistance or training provided to the employee.

_ Notice must include employee’s right to review the record, obtain representation, make an oral or written response, and receive a written decision in a timely manner.
 

DECISION NOTICE _ Decision notice must state whether or not the deciding official found sufficient evidence to support the proposed action. If not, the decision will inform the employee that no action will be taken.

_ Notice must reflect consideration of the employee’s response, if one was made.

_ Notice must state in which critical element(s) the deciding official found the employee to be performing at an unacceptable level.

_ Notice must include employee’s right to challenge the agency’s action through the negotiated grievance procedure (for bargaining unit employees) or by appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

_ Notice must state the effective date of the action.

_ Notice must state 
 

.
.
<<< BACK
E R Z O N E
.

    1