| <<< BACK |
|
.
|
|
Samuel A. Vitaro 1. Framing Charges
a. The Focus on NoticeMason v. Navy , 70 MSPR 584 (1996) Otero v. USPS , 73 MSPR 198 (1997) Alexander v. DOJ **(4/7/98), available from MSPB web
site
b. A Less Legalistic Analysis: Approval of General-Label Charges
LaChance v. MSPB (Crouse), 147 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
c. The Risk in General-Label Charges
d. Continued Loosening
Els v. Army, 82 MSPR 27 (1999) Picariello v. USPS, 80 MSPR 126 (1998) James v. Air Force , 73 MSPR 300 (1997) Hawkins v. Smithsonian, 73 MSPR 397 (1997) Acree v. Treasury, 80 MSPR 73 (1998)
e. Allowing Flexibility in Structuring Charges
f. But Still Scrutinizing the Wording of the Charge
Hanna v. DOL, 80 MSPR 294 (1998) Mann v. DHHS , 78 MSPR 1 (1998) Caronia v. DOJ, 78 MSPR 201 (1998) Acox v.USPS , 76 MSPR 111 (1997)
Mesberg v. USDA, No. 99-3022 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (NP*) Mann v. DHHS, 78 MSPR 1 (1998)
2. Proving Charges
a. Insubordination v. Failure to Follow Orders
Botto v. USPS, 75 MSPR 471 (1997) Haebe v. DOJ, 81 MSPR 167 (1999) Eichner v. USPS, 83 MSPR 202 (1999)
b. Falsification
LaChance v. Erickson, 118 S.Ct. 753 (1998) Brogan v. U.S., 118 S.Ct. 805 (1998) Lying on Application Charges / Douglas Still Applies Perez v. USPS , 75 MSPR 503 (1997) McComb v. USPS, No. 99-3077 (Fed. Cir. 1999)(NP*) Many Distinctions for Penalty Purposes Perez v. USPS , 75 MSPR 503 (1997) McComb v. USPS, No. 99-3077 (Fed. Cir. 1999)(NP*) Robertson v. DOJ, 81 MSPR 658 (1999) House v. USPS, 80 MSPR 138 (1998)
c. Physical Inability to Perform
Yates v. USPS, 70 MSPR 172 (1996) Schrodt v. USPS, 79 MSPR 609 (1998)
d. Vehicle Misuse
Chufo v. Interior, 45 F.3d 419 (Fed.Cir. 1995) Fischer v. Treasury, 69 MSPR 614 (1996)
e. Threats
Powell v. DOJ, 73 MSPR 29 (1997) Larry II v. DOJ, 73 MSPR 348 (1997) See also Daigle v. DVA, 84 MSPR 625 (1999) Strict Application of Metz Castner v. USPS, 77 MSPR 393 (1998) The Way to Prove a Threat Charge Shaw v. Air Force, 80 MSPR 98 (1998)
f. Attendance
Allen v. Army , 76 MSPR 564 (1997) Cole v. DVA , 77 MSPR 434 (1998) Holderness v. DCA, 75 MSPR 401 (1997) Family and Medical Leave Act Claims Burge v. Air Force, 82 MSPR 75 (1999) Ramey v. USPS, 70 MSPR 463 (1996) Crutchfield v. Navy, 73 MSPR 444 (1997) Ellshoff v. Interior, 76 MSPR 54 (1997) Joos v. Treasury, 74 MSPR 684 (1997) Gross v. DOJ, 77 MSPR 83 (1997) Haire v. USPS, No. 97 - 3262 (Fed. Cir. 1997)(NP*) Gardner v. USPS, 79 MSPR 256 (1998) Jefferies v. Navy, 78 MSPR 255 (1998) Young v. USPS, 79 MSPR 25 (1998) Sick Leave and Incapacitation House v. USPS, 80 MSPR 138 (1998)
g. Failure To Cooperate in an Agency Investigation
h. Theft / Conversion
Mann v. DHHS , 78 MSPR 1 (1998) "Mens rea" as an element of theft Peck v. DOD, 75 MSPR 244 (1997)
i. Sexual Harassment
Special Counsel v. Eubanks , 76 MSPR 405 (1997) The double presumption: hostile environment, nexus Pope v. USPS, 114 F.3d 1144 (Fed.Cir. 1997)
k. Conviction
Pawn v. USDA, 82 MSPR 284 (1999)
l. Performance / Chapter 75
Vidal v. USPS , 143 F.3d 145 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Samuel A. Vitaro |
| <<< BACK |
|
|